Possessive Constructions in East Polissian Dialects: East Slavic Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2026.267Keywords:
possessive constructions, external possession, dialectology, East Slavic, Ukrainian, language typologyAbstract
Dialectal morphology and, to a lesser extent, syntax have been relatively well documented in Ukrainian and, more broadly, in East Slavic dialectology. Notwithstanding this achievement, certain morphosyntactic characteristics have received limited attention, particularly from a cross-linguistic and typological perspective. One of these aspects is the encoding of possession in East Polissian (or northeastern) Ukrainian dialects. Possession, as universal, is a fundamental grammatical category, yet its diverse realizations across dialects can shed light on both historical developments and typological patterns within Slavic and European languages. This study addresses this point by examining frequent strategies that East Polissian dialects employ to convey possessive relations.
Drawing on data derived from a personal corpus of dialectal speech, complemented by other primary sources, the analysis focuses on the most salient possessive constructions. Among these, external possessive constructions—based on the esse (‘be’) locative model—emerge as a particularly prominent feature. The findings reveal both continuity with other East Slavic varieties and localized innovations that distinguish East Polissian from other Ukrainian and East Slavic dialect groups.
By providing an account of possessive constructions, this research not only fills a descriptive lacuna in East Slavic dialectology but also contributes to typological debates on possession and grammatical encoding more generally. The results have implications for a more comprehensive understanding of internal variation within Ukrainian, as well as for a more balanced areal-typological assessment of East Slavic within the broader framework of European languages.
Downloads
References
Baron, I., Herslund, M., & Sørensen, F. (Eds.). (2001). Dimensions of possession (Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 47). John Benjamins Publishing.
Bauer, B. (2011). Archaic syntax in Indo-European: The spread of transitivity in Latin and French (Vol. 125). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Benveniste, É. (1966). Être et avoir dans leurs fonctions linguistiques. In Problèmes de linguistique générale (pp. 140–148). Paris: Gallimard.
Clark, E. V. (1978). Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 4: Syntax, pp. 85–126). Standford: Stanford University Press.
Činčlej, K. (1990). Tipologija kategorii posessivnosti. Kišenёv [Chişinău]: Stiinca.
Cienki, A. (1993). Experiencers, Possessors, and Overlap Between Russian Dative and u + Genitive. Berkley Linguistic Society, 19, 76-89.
Danylenko, A. (2002). The East Slavic ‘HAVE’: Revising a developmental scenario. In K. Jones-Bley, M. E. Huld, A. Della Volpe, & M. Robbins Dexter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the UCLA, Los Angeles 2001 (Journal of the Indo-European Studies Monograph Series No. 44, pp. 105–128).
Danylenko, A. (2005). Is there any possessive perfect in North Russian? Word, 56(3), 347–379.
Del Gaudio, S. (1998). Possessive constructions in European languages: A comparison (Unpublished master’s thesis). Università di Napoli Federico II / Freie Universität Berlin.
Del Gaudio, S. (2015). L’ucraino tra le lingue slave. Ricerche Slavistiche, 13(59), 35–71.
Del Gaudio, S. (2017). On the concept of possession and possessive constructions: A preliminary insight. Teoretyčna i dydaktyčna filolohija: Zbirnyk naukovyx prac’, 25, 73–83.
Del Gaudio, S. (2023). Alcune peculiarità morfosintattiche dei dialetti ucraini nord-orientali (contesto slavo-orientale). Europa Orientalis, 42, 425-439.
Del Gaudio, S. (2025b). Ukrainian border dialects in the Belarusian-Russian contact area. New York, London, Oxford etc.: Bloomsbury Academic.
Del Gaudio, S. (2025b). Elementi bielorussi e ucraini nei dialetti russi sud-occidentali (Regione di Brjansk). Studi Slavistici, 2, 203-228.
Grković-Major, J. (2011). The development of predicative possession in Slavic languages. The Grammar of Possessivity in South Slavic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Hokkaido: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 35-54.
Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, pp. 1492–1510). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, B. (1997). Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isačenko, A. S. (1974). On ‘have’ and ‘be’ languages. In M. Flier (Ed.), Slavic forum: Essays in linguistics and literature (pp. 43–77). The Hague-Paris: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jermolenko, S. Ja. (2013). Symvolična i prahmatyčna movna norma. In S. Ja. Jermolenko et al. Literaturna norma i movna praktyka (pp. 255–266). Nižyn: Aspekt-Polihraf.
Justus, C. F. (1999). The arrival of Italic and Germanic ‘have’ in Late Indo-European. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, May 21-23, 1998 (p. 77-94). Washington, D.C.: Study of Man.
Kalnyn’, L. Ė., & Mološnaja, T. N. (Eds.). (1986). Problemy dialektologii: Kategorija posessivnosti. Moskva: Nauka.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2003). Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In F. Plank (Ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe (pp. 621–722). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2004). Possession in Slavic and the Baltic languages: Typological approaches. In The Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 95-107). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
König, E., & Haspelmath, M. (1997). Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues d’Europe. In J. Feuillet (Ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues d’Europe (pp. 525–606). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mazzitelli, L. F. (2012). The expression of predicative possession in Belarusian and Lithuanian (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” / Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz.
Proxorova, S.M. (1991). Sintaksis perexodnoj russko-belorusskoj zony: areal'no-typologičeskie
issledovanija, Minsk: Universitetskoe.
Seiler H. (1983). Possession as an operational dimension of language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Seiler, H. (2001). The operational basis of possession: A dimensional approach revisited. Typological Studies in Language, 47, 27–40.
Stassen, L. (2009). Predicative Possession, New York: Oxford University Press.
Taranenko, O.O. (2024). Ukrajins’ka literaturna mova kincja XX – peršoji čverti XXI st.: stan i tendencji rosvytku. Častyna II. Kyiv: Ukrajins’kyj movno-informacijnyj fond NAN Ukrajiny.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salvatore Del Gaudio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
