Mental Models of the Russian–Ukrainian War: A Popular Science Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2026.2611

Keywords:

Russian–Ukrainian War, cognitive-discursive analysis, communication, mental model, popular science discourse

Abstract

The article addresses the specificity of mental modeling of the Russian-Ukrainian War based on articles from the English popular science media platform The Conversation. A triangulation model for the study of popular science discourse is proposed, conceptualizing it as a complex integrative cognitive-communicative-semiotic formation aimed at popularizing specialized scientific knowledge for a broad non-professional audience and constructing recipients’ mental models for its comprehension. The mental structuring of the events of the Russian-Ukrainian War is carried out through a landscape model, which represents war experience as a multidimensional cognitive space integrating the landscapes of actions, reflections, emotions, and bodily-physiological experience, verbalized through linguistic and discursive means at both micro- and macro-levels. The action landscape models the glocal dynamics of the conflict; the reflective landscape objectifies the analysis of military-political decisions and the features of their individual and collective interpretation; the emotional landscape represents affective responses to wartime events; the bodily-physiological landscape reflects the transformation of cognitive risk assessments into states of anxiety and tension. All landscapes are verbalized through the prism of political, psychological, economic, media, and historical discourses, integrating into a unified transdiscursive configuration.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Popularization. Cambridge English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Retrieved March 28, 2026, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/popularization#google_vignette

2. Greimas, A.-J. (1976). The cognitive dimension of narrative discourse. New Literary History, 7(3), 433–447.

3. Izotova, N. (2025). Transdiscursivity in contemporary English fiction: A world-modelling approach. Visnyk of KNLU, 28(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.2.2025.351772

4. Izotova, N., Sytenka, O. (2024). Sensualizatsiia ukrainskoho voiennoho dyskursu u vymiraniakh transmodalnosti. Ukrainskyi voiennyi dyskurs: polilog zhanriv i stiliv (kolektyvna monografiia). Zahalna redaktsiia Izotova N.P., Potapenko S.I. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr KNLU, pp. 9–33.

5. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4

6. Kot, S., Mozolevska, A., Polishchuk, O., & Stodolinska, Y. (2024). The discursive power of digital popular art during the Russo-Ukrainian war: Re/shaping visual narratives. Arts, 13(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13010038

7. Liebert, W.-A. (2019). Communicative strategies of popularization of science (including science exhibitions, museums, magazines). In A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, & T. Glöning (Eds.), Science communication (pp. 399–416). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522-019

8. Potapenko, S. I., & Andriiko, V. I. (2025). Tri roky viiny – tri novorichni zvernennia Prezydenta Ukrainy: vid idei do slovesnykh efektsiv. Studia Philologica, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425

9. Talmy, L. (2007). Attention Phenomena. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 264–293). Oxford University Press.

10. Taranenko, O. (2023). Rosiisko-ukrainska viina i ukrainska mova (poperedni sposterezhennia). II. Movoznavstvo, 4, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.33190/0027-2833-331-2023-4-001

11. Ukrainskyi voiennyi dyskurs: polilog zhanriv i stiliv (kolektyvna monohrafiia). Zahalna redaktsiia Izotova, N. P., Potapenko, S. I. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr KNLU.

12. van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan..

ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL

1. Horncastle, J. (2025, December 7). Donald Trump’s Ukraine peace deal would leave the country vulnerable to future Russian attacks. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/donald trumps ukraine peace deal would leave the country vulnerable to future russian attacks 270556

2. Wolff, S., & Whitman, R. (2026, March 12). Iran and Ukraine are changing the EU and testing its unity. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/iran and ukraine are changing the eu and testing its unity xxxxxx

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Izotova, N. (2026). Mental Models of the Russian–Ukrainian War: A Popular Science Perspective. Studia Philologica, 1(1 (26), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2026.2611

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.