The Transformation of Literary Genres in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2025.2516Keywords:
digital literature, genre transformation, electronic poetry, fanfiction, multimodality, transmedia storytelling, artificial intelligenceAbstract
This article examines the in-depth evolution of literary genres in the digital age, focusing on the impact of digital technologies, hypertextuality, social media platforms, and interactive media on traditional literary forms. The twenty-first century has been characterized by rapid digitalization, which has reshaped not only modes of communication but also the cultural systems through which literature is produced, distributed, and consumed. The shift from print to digital culture has challenged inherited assumptions about the stability of genres and about the very nature of what constitutes literature. By focusing on both continuity and change, the study seeks to demonstrate how the digital environment has opened new creative horizons while simultaneously raising fundamental theoretical questions for literary studies. The analysis foregrounds how classic genres—novel, poetry, and drama—have evolved in digital environments, giving rise to hybrid and experimental formats. Novels, for example, which historically developed as extended prose narratives with complex plots and character development, have been reconfigured into web novels, serialized online fiction, and fanfiction. These forms thrive on digital platforms such as Wattpad or Archive of Our Own, where amateur and professional authors alike experiment with narrative structures, engage readers in direct interaction, and blur the line between production and reception. Poetry, once confined to the printed page, now appears as digital or visual poetry, algorithmically generated verse, or “Instapoetry” disseminated via social networks like Instagram. Such poetry combines text, image, and design in multimodal arrangements, turning reading into an aesthetic experience that is both literary and visual. Drama has also undergone profound changes: traditional theatre is complemented by interactive/VR performances and narrative-driven video games such as Life is Strange or Detroit: Become Human. These forms retain the performative and dialogic core of drama but embed it within immersive environments that demand active participation from audiences. Taken together, these examples reveal that digital literature is not a marginal phenomenon but a central arena where genres are being redefined in real time. Drawing on theoretical approaches from literary studies, cultural studies, and digital humanities, the article highlights the main tendencies in the reshaping of literary genres. Four processes appear particularly crucial. The first is multimodality: the integration of verbal, visual, auditory, and interactive codes within a single work. Unlike traditional literature, which privileges written text, digital literature invites the reader to navigate between modes, thereby altering the experience of meaning-making. The second is interactivity, whereby the reader no longer remains a passive consumer but becomes a co-creator of meaning. Hypertext fiction, branching narratives, and game-based storytelling require choices, decisions, and interpretive engagement that shape the course of the text. The third is transmediality: stories unfold across multiple platforms, with each medium contributing to the expansion of the narrative world. Literary genres thus become nodes within broader media ecosystems, extending from novels to films, video games, fan communities, and virtual reality installations. The fourth is democratization: digital environments lower the barriers to literary production, enabling a wide range of voices, including marginalized communities, to participate in creating and circulating literature. These dynamics show how digital transformation is not merely technical but also cultural and political, redefining the authority of authors, publishers, and critics. The findings underline the dual nature of digital transformation. On the one hand, it expands creative possibilities, fosters experimentation, and increases accessibility. Literature can now be produced collaboratively, disseminated instantly across the globe, and re-imagined through multimedia and interactive affordances. For example, readers may annotate texts, contribute to story development, or remix existing works, creating new genres in the process. On the other hand, digital transformation challenges traditional concepts of authorship, textuality, and canon formation. If authorship becomes distributed among multiple contributors, how do we define originality? If texts are endlessly revisable and fragmentary, what counts as a literary work? If the canon is no longer established by academic institutions but by online communities, how stable are the categories of “classic” and “popular”? These questions point to deep tensions between innovation and tradition, between openness and authority. The article concludes by outlining future perspectives of literary genres in the context of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and global digital communication. Artificial intelligence already generates poems, short stories, and even novels, raising debates about creativity, authenticity, and human-machine collaboration. While some critics see AI literature as derivative and lacking intentionality, others argue that it opens novel possibilities for aesthetic experimentation, algorithmic creativity, and hybrid authorship. Virtual reality, meanwhile, promises immersive narrative environments where literature merges with architecture, performance, and design. In such contexts, the boundaries between genres blur further, giving rise to interactive theatre, narrative gaming, and embodied storytelling. Global digital communication ensures that these innovations circulate rapidly across cultural and linguistic boundaries, fostering cross-cultural hybridization but also creating challenges of preservation, accessibility, and critical evaluation. Beyond technological innovation, the article stresses that the study of digital literature must be situated within the broader framework of the digital humanities. This interdisciplinary field combines computational tools with humanistic inquiry, enabling large-scale analysis of digital texts, visualization of intertextual patterns, and investigation of online communities. By adopting methods of textual analysis, comparative genre studies, and digital ethnography, researchers can capture the multidimensional processes through which genres evolve in the digital environment. Case studies of platforms such as Wattpad, AO3, and Instagram illustrate how participatory culture not only reshapes literature but also fosters new forms of identity, community, and cultural negotiation. For instance, fanfiction communities challenge canonical authority, amplify marginalized voices, and generate alternative narrative universes. Instapoetry reaches audiences who might never read traditional poetry, democratizing literary culture but also raising questions about commercialization and aesthetic value. Such examples demonstrate that digital genres are simultaneously inclusive and contested, experimental and institutionalized. The article also addresses implications for education and cultural preservation. In classrooms, digital literature can be used to foster critical literacy, creativity, and intercultural competence. By engaging students with multimodal texts, educators can encourage them to analyze the interplay of language, image, and design, as well as the role of interactivity and choice. Digital genres also highlight global perspectives, exposing students to diverse cultural voices and collaborative forms of creativity. At the same time, the ephemerality of digital formats poses significant risks for preservation. Unlike print texts, which can survive for centuries in libraries and archives, digital works may vanish due to platform obsolescence, lack of archival infrastructure, or changes in corporate ownership. Ensuring the survival of digital literature requires sustained institutional commitment to open access, metadata standards, and digital preservation strategies. From a sociocultural perspective, the transformation of genres reflects larger patterns of globalization, cultural hybridity, and identity formation. Online communities are often transnational, bringing together authors and readers from different cultural backgrounds. This diversity enriches literary production but also challenges traditional notions of national literature and linguistic boundaries. Genres such as web novels from East Asia, fanfiction in English, or digital poetry in multilingual formats demonstrate how literary innovation increasingly occurs in cross-cultural spaces. The digital age thus demands new frameworks for comparative literature that move beyond national canons to account for global flows of texts, images, and narratives. In terms of methodology, the article combines close reading of digital texts with contextual analysis of platforms and communities. It emphasizes that literary genres cannot be studied solely as textual categories but must be understood as dynamic cultural practices shaped by technology, institutions, and audiences. The comparative approach highlights both continuity and rupture: web novels recall the seriality of nineteenth-century print culture but innovate through interactivity and reader engagement; Instapoetry resonates with modernist brevity but adapts to the affordances of social media; VR drama inherits the performativity of theatre but situates it within immersive spaces. These comparisons demonstrate that genres are not disappearing in the digital age but rather mutating, hybridizing, and adapting. Finally, the article points toward future directions of research. Longitudinal studies are needed to trace which digital genres persist, which fade, and which transform into new categories. Comparative cross-cultural studies can illuminate differences in how genres evolve in distinct linguistic and cultural contexts. Analyses of authorship and identity can reveal how digital platforms reshape the relationship between creators, audiences, and institutions. Educational research can explore how digital literature fosters literacy, creativity, and intercultural understanding. And theoretical reflection must continue to question how genres are defined, how texts acquire meaning, and how literature functions within a digital, globalized society. In conclusion, the transformation of literary genres in the digital age illustrates a profound cultural shift toward interactivity, inclusivity, and multimodality. The digital environment has expanded the possibilities of literary creation, circulation, and reception, enabling voices once excluded from mainstream publishing to gain visibility. At the same time, it has destabilized inherited concepts of authorship, textuality, and canon formation, forcing scholars, educators, and readers to rethink the foundations of literary culture. As technology continues to evolve—through artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, and global communication networks — literature will remain at the forefront of negotiating the boundaries between human creativity and digital innovation. This ongoing transformation demands critical engagement, interdisciplinary methodologies, and openness to new forms of expression, ensuring that literature retains its role as a vital medium of cultural reflection in the digital century.
Downloads
References
Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press. file:///C:/Users/oksan/Downloads/2228-Texto%20do%20artigo-7679-1-10-20110712.pdf
Alexander, B., & Levine, A. (2008). Web 2.0 storytelling: Emergence of a new genre. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(6), 40–56. doi: 10.4236/jss.2016.47020.
Black, R. W. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. Peter Lang. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Adolescents_and_Online_Fan_Fiction.html?id=_RTYfNHABvMC&redir_esc=y
Derecho, A. (2006). Archontic literature: A definition, a history, and several theories of fan fiction. In K. Hellekson & K. Busse (Eds.), Fan fiction and fan communities in the age of the Internet (pp. 61–78). McFarland. https://ru.scribd.com/document/833463637/Derecho-Abigail-Archontic-LiteratureFunkhouser, C. T. (2007). Prehistoric digital poetry: An archeology of forms, 1959–1995. University of Alabama Press.
Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549373
Gibbons, A. (2017). Multimodality, cognition, and experimental literature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645390
Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.14624
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and every day. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474218092
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/san/waysofbeing/data/communication-zangana-jenkins-2006.pdf
Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press. DOI: 10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16054
Kestemont, M., Manjavacas, E., & van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence and literary creativity: Current debates and future perspectives. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab042
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.https://dss-edit.com/plu/Manovich-Lev_The_Language_of_the_New_Media.pdf
Murray, J. H. (2017). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace (Updated ed.). MIT Press. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ublend-parse-storage/ab4f5a00be37d01bea0b9a01a32c0070murray__janet_hamlet_on_the_holodeck.pdf
Ryan, M.-L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1637100
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2016). A new companion to digital humanities. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch29
Thomas, B. (2020). Literature in the digital age: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635356
Vandermeersche, G., & Soetaert, R. (2016). Literature, through the eyes of science fiction: Posthuman narratives and cultural analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401772369
Walsh, R. (2011). Narratology and creativity: Toward a synthesis. Poetics Today, 32(2), 221–250. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289287
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Melnyk O.V., Kyselova I.I., Tereshchuk M.O.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.