The Political Rhetoric of King Charles III: a Stylistic and Functional Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2025.256

Keywords:

political rhetoric, stylistic devices, tropes, political discourse, discourse analysis, public speaking, British monarchy

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify, classify, and interpret the stylistic devices and tropes used in the political speeches of King Charles III (2022-2025), and to analyze their functions in the context of contemporary monarchical discourse.

Five main types of stylistic devices have been identified: syntactic-structural (e.g., anaphora, inversion), emotional-expressive (e.g., rhetorical questions, allusions), ritualistic (e.g., archaisms, ceremonial formulas), humanistic (e.g., inclusivity, moral appeals), and performative (e.g., intonation, pausing).

It has been determined that stylistic techniques perform a representative function of the monarch, and they become a means of forming political culture, mobilizing social values, and adapting the monarchy to the new conditions of the global world.

The study reveals that Charles III’s speeches represent a model of strategically structured, stylistically refined, and functionally multifaceted discourse. The monarch’s language blends verbal tradition, institutional legitimacy, and contemporary communicative sensitivity.

The study results show that Charles III’s speeches are the element of the British monarchy’s “soft power”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asmakovska, H. H., & Sharmanova, N. M. (2025). Tropy yak stylistychni zasoby vyrazhennia estetychnoi ta kohnityvnoi funktsii movy. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filolohichni nauky, (104), 82–92.

Batsevych, F. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: Akademiia.

Byndas, O. M. (2018). Syntaksychno-stylistychna osoblyvist anhlomovnykh promov ukrainskykh politykiv. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Filolohiia, 2, 5–10. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvuufilol_2018_2_3

Vashchuk, T. (2007). Politychnyi dyskurs iak obiekt linhvistychnoho doslidzhennia. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, (33), 182–185.

Vusyk, H., & Antoniuk, O. (2020). Suchasnyi politychnyi dyskurs yak obiekt linhvistychnykh doslidzhen. Visnyk studentskoho naukovoho tovarystva DonNU imeni Vasylia Stusa, 12(2), 213–217.

Dvornyk, N., & Popova, O. V. (2013). Stylistychni zasoby politychnykh promov (na materiali politychnykh zvernen Baraka Obamy). In V. V. Opanasiuk (Ed.), Sotsialno-humanitarni aspekty rozvytku suchasnoho suspilstva: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovoi konferentsii vykladachiv, aspirantiv, spivrobitnykiv ta studentiv fakultetu inozemnoi filolohii ta sotsialnykh komunikatsii (pp. 28–29). Sumy: SumDU.

Selivanova, O. (2006). Suchasna linhvistyka: terminolohichna entsyklopediia. Poltava: Dovkillia-K.

Rusanivskyi, V. M., & Taranenko, O. O. (Eds.). (2004). Ukrainska mova: Entsyklopediia. Kyiv: Ukr. entsykl. im. M. P. Bazhana.

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London: Routledge.

Cannadine, D. (2018). The Royal Family and monarchy in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Craig, R. (2023). Rhetorical transition: King Charles III and the burden of royal speech. Journal of British Studies, 62(1), 45–62. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2022.45

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Smith, A. D. (2010). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.

The Royal Household. (2025). Speeches and articles. URL:https://www.royal.uk/media-centre/speeches

Strong, R. (2005). The story of Britain’s monarchy. London: Phoenix.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

Winston, M. (2022, September 12). King Charles III: A shift in tone and symbolism. The Guardian. URL:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/12/king-charles-symbolism-speech

Downloads


Abstract views: 17

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Єсипенко, Н., & Ванчуляк, Я. (2025). The Political Rhetoric of King Charles III: a Stylistic and Functional Analysis. Studia Philologica, (2 (25), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2025.256