Economic Discourse: Main Peculiarities in English and Spanish

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2023.213

Keywords:

economic discourse, globalization, metaphor, loanwords, Anglicisms, morphosyntactic features

Abstract

The paper highlights modern economic discourse peculiarities in English and Spanish. Everyday life is determined by the economic situation on the national, regional and international levels. Thus, the economy plays a leading role  in any society. The presented research aims to outline language changes on the lexical and morphosyntactic levels that exist in the modern English and Spanish economic discourse. The article introduces the discussion about English overwhelming influence over all other languages in the economic and business area.   Nowadays, as a result of globalization, economic discourse has become uniform everywhere. Nevertheless, the uniformity level can differ even in one language group. For instance, Italian is much more receptive to borrowings from  English than Spanish or French. At the same time Spanish is evaluated in this research as a purist language example as it has changed to a lesser extent than other languages on the lexical level. This feature is clearly represented by Spanish economic discourse metaphors. For example, famous English metaphors “bear” and “bull” correspond to Spanish “bajista” and “alcista”. At the same time some Spanish metaphors coincide with English ones (the Debt Service (Eng.) – el Servicio de la Deuda (Sp.), country risk (Eng.) – riesgo país (Sp.)). Syntactic structures analysis enabled to investigate several English and Spanish economic discourse phenomena. One of the most important phenomena involves changes of grammatical category, especially the nominalisation of verbs in order to indicate processes as well as of adjectives in order to indicate conditions and qualities. As a nominalisation process consequence, ellipsis, Passive Voice and intransitive verbs employment is observed.  In general, it is proved that Passive Voice is used more in English than in Spanish. Nevertheless, Passive Voice is used in Spanish economic discourse to emphasise its impersonality, i.e. subject in the sentence is not expressed by an author but by the action itself. The use of personalisation and metaphors helps to explain abstract notions, i.e., accountability, value, validity, welfare (Eng.) as well as la responsabilidad, valor, la validez, el bienestar (Sp.)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aimenova, M., Ospanova, A., Rakhimova, A., Sarsembayeva, A., & Mazhit, Z. (2019). Phraseological terminology in the English economic discourse. XLinguae, Vol. 12(1), 228-238. http://xlinguae.eu/files/XLinguae1_2019_18.pdf

Alcaraz Varó, E. y Hughes, B. (2002). Diccionario de términos económicos, financieros y comerciales. Inglés-Español, Español-Inglés. Ariel.

Alcaraz Varó, E. (2000). El inglés profesional y académico. Alianza.

Álvarez García, M. C. (2011). Estudio del lenguaje de especialidad económico: el lenguaje del comercio internacional. Entreculturas, (3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.24310/Entreculturasertci.vi3.11681

Bachiller, J., Fraile, E. (2015). Caricatura y metáfora sobre la crisis del euro en la prensa económica europea. Estudios de Economía aplicada, 34 (2), 441-468. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/301/30146038007.pdf

Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2009). Linguistic Borrowing in the English Language of Economics. Journal in English Lexicology, 3, 107-137. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.643

Busquet, S.A. (2021). El uso de metáforas en el discurso económico: Breve análisis sobre el modo en que las crisis sanitarias permean la información sobre cuestiones económicas. Bridging Cultures, (6), 8-93. Departamento de Lenguas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Católica Argentina. https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/BRID/article/download/3787/3735

Dogan, B., & Michailidou, A. (2008). Trading in prehistory and protohistory: perspectives from the Eastern Aegean and beyond. In Ch. Papageorgiadou & A. Giannikuri (Eds.), Sailing in the Aegean. Readingson the economy and trade routes, (pp.17-53). MELETHMATA 53. https://helios-eie.ekt.gr/EIE/bitstream/10442/8464/1/A01.053.0.01.pdf

Goodrich, P. (1984). Legal Discourse; Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. University of Edinburgh.

Katamba, F. (2004). English Words: Structure, History, Usage. Routledge.

Kolesnyk, O. (2018). Verbal Representations of the Value-Concepts: A Linguo-Cultural Sketch. Linguaculture, 9(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.47743/lincu-2018-1-0112

Kolesnyk, O. (2019). Ekzystentsiini fenomeny u movi ta mifolohichnomu prostori. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu, 65(1), 77-87. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/28917 (in Ukrainian).

Kolesnyk, O., Holtseva, M. (2022). Lies and deception in modern english diplomatic discourse: pragmatics in interdisciplinary focus, Cogito, 14 (1), 154-173. https://cogito.ucdc.ro/COGITO_MARTIE_2022.pdf

Kopytina, A., Makhachashvili, R. (2021). Associative conceptual constant of subconcepts E-space and Cyberspace. Periodyk naukowy akademii polonijnej (1), 71-84. http://pnap.ap.edu.pl/index.php/pnap/article/view/660

Kravchenko, N.K. (2007). Mizhnarodno-pravovyi dyskurs: kognityvno-komunikatyvnyi aspekt [Dissertation for Sc.D. Degree in Philology (10. 02. 15 -General linguistics), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv] (in Ukrainian).

Loma-Osorio Fontecha, M. (2004). Estructura y función del texto económico fundamentos de una léxico-gramática del discurso económico en español y en inglés [Thesis for PhD Degree in Philology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid] https://www.europeana.eu/mt/item/9200101/BibliographicResource_1000126629852

Lucy, J.A. (1997). Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291-312. https://www.annualreviews.org/toc/anthro/26/1

Makhachashvili, R.K., Bilyk, K. (2021, March). Doslidzhennia funktsionalno-linhvistychnykh aspektiv zaholovkiv tekstiv novyn u suchasnomu frantsuzkomu mediadyskursi. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, Seria Filologia, 1(48), 139-143. http://www.vestnik-philology.mgu.od.ua/index.php/arkhiv-nomeriv?id=185 (in Ukrainian).

Makhachashvili, R.K., Semenist, I.V. (2021, December). Modeliuvannia innovatsiinoi movnoi komunikatsii u tsyfrovomu seredovyshchi (na materiali yevropeiskykh ta aziiskykh variantiv anhliiskoi movy). Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, Seria Filologia 52(1), 127-131. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/40902 (in Ukrainian).

Milroy, J. (1992). A social model for the interpretation of language change, In Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen (Eds.), History of Englishes: 8ew New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics (pp. 72-91), Walter de Gruyter.

Rainer, F., & Schnitzer, J. (2010). Neología y variación regional en la terminología económica del español. Actes del I Congrés Internacional de Neologia de les Llengües Romàniques, (pp. 661-672). Barcelona, Spain: IULA.

Rainer, F. (2018, July 30). The Language of the Economy and Business in the Romance Languages. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Retrieved 9 Nov. 2023, from https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-476.

Redondo Redondo, A. (2017). Análisis del discurso económico en el ámbito político de la crisis del euro (inglés-español). Universidad de Valladolid. https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/27730

Savelyuk, N. (2020). Ekonomichnyi dyskurs: teoretychne obgruntuvannia psykholinhvistychnykh aspektiv, Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 22–23 October, 2020), (pp. 212-216). https://doi.org/10.31470/2706-7904-2020-15-212-216 (in Ukrainian).

Semenist, I.V., Makhachashvili, R.K. (2021, September 14). Verbal modelling of innovative educational communication in the digital discourse. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Series: "Philology. Journalism", 32(71), (4), 54-61. https://www.philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/archive?id=78

Semenist, I.V., Makhachashvili, R.K. (2021, September 30). Innovative educational communication in the digital discourse: models and tools. Topical Issues in the Humanities: Intercollegiate Collection of Scientific Papers of Young Scientists of Ivan Franko Drohobych State Pedagogical University, 41 (3), 119-128. http://www.aphn-journal.in.ua/41-3-2021

Yebra, V.G. (1984). Teoría y práctica de la traducción. Gredos.

Zhang, W., Grenier, G. (2012). How can Language be linked to Economics? A Survey of Two Strands of Research. WORKING PAPER #1206E. Department of Economics Faculty of Social Sciences Université d’Ottawa. University of Ottawa.

https://socialsciences.uottawa.ca/economics/sites/socialsciences.uottawa.ca.economics/files/1206E.pdf

Downloads


Abstract views: 69

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Butko, O. (2023). Economic Discourse: Main Peculiarities in English and Spanish. Studia Philologica, 21(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2023.213

Issue

Section

Linguistics